So you think the 1952 Immigration Act is being manipulated to circumvent 1A? Will be interesting to see what the court thinks. "Conduct detrimental to US" is vague and I guess I agree that protesting a government policy probably shouldn't be deemed as such.
exactly -- if "detrimental" = stuff we don't agree with, then it should rule against the Trump admin. If there's something more substantive, then they should win.
So you think the 1952 Immigration Act is being manipulated to circumvent 1A? Will be interesting to see what the court thinks. "Conduct detrimental to US" is vague and I guess I agree that protesting a government policy probably shouldn't be deemed as such.
exactly -- if "detrimental" = stuff we don't agree with, then it should rule against the Trump admin. If there's something more substantive, then they should win.
Khalil is not a citizen therefore he doesn't have the same rights as citizens do.
with respect to the 1A, so long as he's here legally, he has exactly the same rights